← Cases

Veniero v. Veniero

262 A.D. 738 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1941-05-29 English

Contents

Majority

p. 738
Peter Veniero, Respondent, v. Michael Veniero and Others, Appellants.

It is impossible to determine from the conflicting affidavits which appear in the record whether or not the defendants violated the terms of the stipulation of settlement. The only fact which the defendants do not dispute is the removal of the plaintiff as an officer, employee and director of the corporation. However, they assert that their action was justified because of his grievous misconduct

p. 739
in connection with corporate affairs. We have determined, therefore, that the order should be reversed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellants, and the controversy referred to an official referee to hear and report as soon as possible to Special Term. Settle order on notice. Present —: Martin, P. J., O’Malley, Glennon, Cohn and Callahan, JJ.