Hyperlawhypertext legal database City of Little Falls v. Reardon 264 A.D. 826

← Cases

City of Little Falls v. Reardon

264 A.D. 826 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1942-05-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 826
City of Little Falls, Appellant, v. John C. Reardon and Others, Defendants, and Little Falls National Bank, Respondent.

Order reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion to strike out the answer and for summary judgment granted, with ten dollars costs, on the authority of

p. 827
Mongaup Valley Company, Inc., v. Orange Bod & Cun Club, Inc. ( 253 App. Div. 465 ; affd., 280 N. Y. 582 ). All concur. (The order denies plaintiff’s motion to strike out the answer of defendant bank and for entry of summary judgment in favor of plaintiff.) Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Dowling, Harris and McCum, JJ.

Cases cited