Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Schneider v. Durst Manufacturing Co. 265 A.D. 1022

← Cases

Claim of Schneider v. Durst Manufacturing Co.

265 A.D. 1022 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1943-01-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1022
In the Matter of the Claim of Gustave Schneider, Respondent, against Durst Manufacturing Company et al., Appellants. State Industrial Board et al., Respondents.
p. 1023
The furnishing of the truss is a payment of compensation within the meaning of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. (Matter of Patti v. Knickerbocker Fireproofing Co., 280 N. Y. 609 ; Matter of Gabrielli v. City of New York, 258 App. Div. 1015 , leave to appeal denied, 282 N. Y. 809 .) Decision reopening the case and order directing the carrier to provide a truss affirmed with costs to the State Industrial Board. Present — Hill, P. J., Crapser, Bliss, Heffernan and Sehenck, JJ.

Cases cited