Otto v. Otto

265 A.D. 1037 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1943-01-27 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1037

In the Matter of Hesther Otto, Respondent, v. John Otto, 2nd, Appellant.

All concur, except Harris, J., not voting. (The order directs defendant to pay ten dollars per week until plaintiff’s judgment against defendant is fully satisfied; the second order

p. 1038

denies defendant’s motion to modify the previous order.) Present — Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling, Harris and MeCurn, JJ.