← Cases

Vunk v. Roe

265 A.D. 1060 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1943-02-01 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1060
John R. Vunk et al, Copartners, Practicing Law under the Name of Vunk & Carleton, Appellants, v. Norman W. Roe, Respondent.

That the sum of $40,000 was allowed pursuant to order of the Surrogate’s Court of Suffolk County is conceded and is a matter of public record; and it is undisputed that such sum was actually received by plaintiffs. There is-no need for an examination to establish such facts. Close, P. J., Hagarty, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ., concur.