Dusenbury v. State

266 A.D. 889 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1943-06-30 Docket Claim No. 25817 English

Contents

Majority

p. 889

William H. Dusenbury, Appellant, v. State of New York, Respondent.

(Claim No. 25817.)

p. 890

Crapser, Heffeman and Sehenek, JJ., concur; Hill, P. J., and Bliss, J., dissent upon the ground that chapter 142 of the Laws of 1938 constituted a change in plans on the part of the State and under the contract claimant was entitled to receive the actual cost of the discarded plans.