Schulz v. Caserta

271 A.D.2d 928 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1947-01-13 English

Contents

Majority

p. 928

William A. Schulz, Doing Business under the Name of William Adam Schulz Company, Appellant, v. Charles Caserta, Respondent.

In an action to recover broker’s commissions for the sale of real property, order denying plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment affirmed, with $10 costs and disburse-' ments. No opinion. Lewis, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Aldrich and Nolan, JJ., concur.