Hyperlawhypertext legal database Claim of Torrence v. Ringling Bros. 272 A.D.2d 1083

← Cases

Claim of Torrence v. Ringling Bros.

272 A.D.2d 1083 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1947-11-12 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1083
In the Matter of the Claim of Frank Torrence, Respondent, against Ringling Brothers, Barnum & Bailey et al., Appellants. Workmen’s Compensation Board, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied, without costs. Hill, P. J., Heffernan, Foster and Russell, JJ., concur; Brewster, J., taking no part. [See ante, p. 986.]