← Cases

Pomerance v. Pomerance

272 A.D.2d 768 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1947-04-07 English

Contents

Majority

p. 768
Ruth Pomerance, Appellant, v. William Pomerance, Respondent.

Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Does the amended complaint state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action? Present — Hagarty, Acting P. J., Carswell, Adel, Nolan and Sneed, JJ. [See 271 App. Div. 1207 .]