← Cases

Jackson v. Raleigh Associates, Inc.

273 A.D. 1002 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1948-05-24 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1002
Emily S. Jackson, Appellant, v. Raleigh Associates, Inc., et al., Respondents.

We think that the applicability of the defenses set up in the amended replies should await the trial. Order denying plaintiff’s motion for leave to serve amended replies to the answers of the defendants unanimously reversed, with $10 costs and disbursements to the appellant, and the motion granted. Settle order on notice. Present — Peck, P. J., Glennon, Dore, Van Voorhis and Shientag, JJ. [See 274 App. Div. 821 .]