Majority
Evidence was introduced and received without objection sufficient to present questions for determination by the jury as to whether or not a determination had been made by an attending physician that such sideboards were necessary as a protective measure, and as to whether or not a nurse associated with the defendant hospital had been directed by the doctor to see to it that the sideboards were installed. There was also evidence that the hospital authorities had been directed by the doctor to put up the sideboards, and had neglected to do so. The omissions which were alleged to have caused the injuries were such that appellant could have been held liable therefor, regardless of its status as a charitable institution (Sheehan v. North Country Community Hosp., 273 N. Y. 163 ; Bickford v. Peck Memorial Hosp., 266 App. Div. 875 ; Ranelli v.
Cases cited
- Sheehan v. North Country Community Hospital 273 N. Y. 163 p. 1047
- Ranelli v. Society of the New York Hospital 295 N. Y. 850 p. 1048
- Claim of Renouf v. New York Central Railroad 254 N. Y. 349 p. 1048
- Steinert v. Brunswick Home, Inc. 172 Misc. 787 p. 1048
- Haefeli v. Woodrich Engineering Co. 255 N. Y. 442 p. 1048
- Leonard v. Home Owners' Loan Corp. 297 N. Y. 103 p. 1048