← Cases

Scordo v. Terrell

275 A.D.2d 940 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1949-06-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 940
Rosario Scordo, Appellant, v. Ethel H. Terrell, Respondent.

Since it is clear from the affidavits that defendant’s default was neither inadvertent nor excusable, and that no meritorious defense is shown, it was an improvident exercise of discretion

p. 941
to grant the motion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ., concur.