Slanec v. Hung Kan

279 A.D. 1020 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1952-04-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1020

Jeanne Slanec, an Infant, by Her Guardian ad Litem, Frank Slanec, et al., Respondents, v. Hung Kan, Defendant, and Karl Schulz, Appellant.

p. 1021

In our opinion the denial of the application under the circumstances, was an improvident exercise of discretion. (Cf. Gately v. City of New York, 279 App. Div. 807 .) Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.