Hartman v. Hartman

279 A.D. 606 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1951-10-22 English

Contents

Majority

p. 606

Gertrude Hartman, Appellant, v. Moritz Hartman, Respondent.

Since the judgment was on the merits and not a nonsuit, a decision

p. 607

stating the facts which the trial court deemed essential was required. (Mario v. De Oteris, 275 App. Div. 790 ; Goldberg V. Bruns, Kimball & Co., 276 App. Div. 862 .) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.