Majority
p. 670Dorothy E. Raynor, Appellant, v. Clifton E. Raynor, Respondent.
Defendant’s remarriage, with its attendant additional obligations, is not such a change in circumstances as to justify a reduction of the amount of alimony. (Goldberg v. Goldberg, 265 App. Div. 946 ; Withowski v. Withowski, 271 App. Div. 901 , affd. 297 N. Y. 626 .) Appeal from order dated September 18, 1950, dismissed, without costs. Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MacCrate, JJ., concur.