Majority
p. 671Dorothy E. Raynor, Appellant, v. Clifton E. Raynor, Respondent.
The court had jurisdiction of the parties and the subject matter, on the motion for a reduction of alimony (Fox v. Fox, 263 N. Y. 68 ; Civ. Prac. Act, § 1170), and the lack of an authenticating certificate was a defect or irregularity which could be corrected nunc pro tunc. (Cf. Kelly v. Schramm, 197 App. Div. 377 ; Lawton v. Kiel, 51 Barb. 30 ; Civ. Prac. Act, § 105.) Nolan, P. J., Johnston, Adel, Sneed and MaeCrate, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Fox v. Fox 263 N. Y. 68 p. 671
- Lawton v. Kiel 51 Barb. 30 p. 671