Edell v. Edell

279 A.D. 925 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1952-03-17 English

Contents

Majority

p. 925

Ruth Edell, Respondent, v. Joseph Edell, Appellant.

In our opinion, the items allowed, as indicated, are proper subjects of amplification by a bill of particulars under the pleading. Carswell, Acting P. J., Johnston, Adel, Wenzel and MacCrate, JJ., concur. [See post, p. 1009.]