Herold v. Silston

279 A.D. 926 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1952-03-17 English

Contents

Majority

p. 926

Martin H. Herold, Respondent, v. Eugenia Silston et al., Appellants.

The renewal note did not effect payment on the prior note, now sued upon, and the payee was, therefore, an owner and holder, entitled to sue and, on proper proof, entitled to recover thereon. Present — Nolan, P. J., Carswell, Adel, Wenzel and Schmidt, JJ.