← Cases

Bruman v. Jonathan Logan, Inc.

279 A.D. 984 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1952-04-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 984
Samuel Bruman et al., Respondents, v. Jonathan Logan, Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

Although we held the examination to be material and necessary to enable plaintiffs to prepare for trial, we are not called upon at this point to evaluate the probative force of the evidence to be disclosed in order to determine the correct measure of damages. The date for the examination to proceed shall be fixed in the order. Settle order on notice. Present — Dore, J. P., Cohn, Callahan, Yan Yoorhis and Shientag, JJ.