Hyperlawhypertext legal database Leto v. Spies 280 A.D. 824

← Cases

Leto v. Spies

280 A.D. 824 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1952-06-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 824
Anna Leto, Respondent, v. Murray R. Spies et al., Appellants, et al., Defendants.

In an action for judgment declaring respondent to be the owner of certain mortgages, and for other relief, order denying appellants’ motion,

p. 825
under rule 90 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for an order requiring respondent to separately state and number causes of action, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Carswell, Acting P. J., Adel, Wenzel, MacCrate and Schmidt, JJ., concur.