Bradick v. Deetjen

282 A.D. 871 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1953-10-27 English

Contents

Majority

p. 871

Albert Bradick, Respondent, v. Rudolph H. Deetjen et al., Appellants.

To enable plaintiff to substantiate the alleged misrepresentations concerning plaintiff’s interest in the firm leading to the settlement and releases, plaintiff is entitled to the items allowed. Order unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the plain tiff-respondent. Settle order on notice. Present — Peek, P. J., Dore, Callahan, Breitel and Bastow, JJ.