← Cases

Mioducki v. Becht

285 A.D. 863 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1955-01-14 English

Contents

Majority

p. 863
Raymond F. Mioducki, Appellant, v. Richard P. Becht, Defendant, and Harry Becht, Respondent.

Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We regard the order appealed from as a discretionary order and we see no reason to disturb the discretion of the Special Term. All concur. (Appeal from an order of Erie Special Term directing plaintiff to serve a further bill of particulars, in an automobile negligence action.) Present — McGurn, P. J., Vaughan, Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.