Majority
p. 878William J. Lutes, Respondent, v. Sol A. Shenk, Doing Business as Shenco Sales Company, et al., Appellants.
Order appealed from unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to respondent. We do not pass upon the question of whether or not the written agreement is illusory. Present — Cohn, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Botein and Rabin, JJ. [See post, pp. .942, 943.]