Lawlor v. Magnolia Metal Co. — 44 A.D. 632

Majority

p. 632

James Lawlor, Respondent, v. Magnolia Metal Company, Appellant.

Headnote

Order affirmed, ivitli ten dollars costs and disbursements.—Appeal from an order denying the defendant’s motion to require the plaintiff to increase-his undertaking on attachment.

The learned judge was justified in denying the motion because it was a renewal of amotion, without leave, which had.

p. 633

"been denied four years ago. The order should be affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Present —Van Brunt, P. J., Rumsey, Patterson, O’Brien and Ingraham,