Hyperlawhypertext legal database Pavia & Co. S. P. A. v. Siegel Chemical Co. 1 A.D.2d 651

← Cases

Pavia & Co. S. P. A. v. Siegel Chemical Co.

1 A.D.2d 651 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1955-12-01 English

Contents

Majority

p. 651
Pavia & Co. S. P. A., et al., Appellants, v. Siegel Chemical Co., Inc., Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Great Eastern Parking & Paper Stock Corporation, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.

Motion denied. The parties should be able to stipulate to eliminate from the printed record on appeal such parts of the examinations as are not essential to the questions presented on the appeal. Costs and disbursements may be imposed upon respondents if the printed record on appeal is found to be needlessly extended. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Bastow, Botein and Rabin, JJ.