Majority
p. 875Jerome S. Heller et al., Appellants, v. Daniel L. Rose et al., Respondents.
In an action to impress a trust on real and personal property, and for other relief, plaintiffs appeal from an order which (1) granted a motion by defendant Rose for reargument, (2) upon reargument denied plaintiffs’ motion for an order of preclusion, and (3) vacated the final order of preclu
p. 876
sion theretofore entered. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P. J., Beldock, Christ, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.