Majority
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: After question-
ing defendant about his decision to plead guilty to first degree possession of gambling records, the court refused to accept defendant’s plea. Defendant was subsequently tried by a jury and convicted of possession of gambling records in the first degree (Penal Law, § 225.20) and promoting gambling in the first degree (Penal Law, § 225.10). The court’s refusal to accept defendant’s plea was proper. It is well settled that a defendant has no absolute right to have his plea accepted by the court and that the decision whether to accept a reduced plea is a matter within the court’s discretion (Santobello v New York, 404 US 257 ; People v Griffith, 43 AD2d 20 ). We do not agree with defendant’s contention
Cases cited
- Santobello v. New York 404 US 257 p. 1024
- People v. Griffith 43 AD2d 20 p. 1024