Hyperlawhypertext legal database Eckert v. Columbus McKinnon Corp. 105 A.D.2d 1105

← Cases

Eckert v. Columbus McKinnon Corp.

105 A.D.2d 1105 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1984-11-07 Docket Appeal No. 1 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1105
Ronald Eckert, Appellant, v Columbus McKinnon Corporation, Defendant, and International Association of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, District No. 76, AFL-CIO,
p. 1106
Local 2108, et al., Respondents.
(Appeal No. 1.)

Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: Special Term erred in granting the motion made by defendant against the complaint pursuant to CPLR 3211 (subd [a], par 7). It is well settled that a complaint should not be dismissed on a pleading motion so long as, when the complaint is given the benefit of every possible favorable inference, a cause of action is stated (see Rovello v Orofino Realty Co., 40 NY2d 633 , 634; Guggenheimer v Ginzburg, 43 NY2d 268 , 275). (Appeal from order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Ostrowski, J. — dismiss complaint.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Hancock, Jr., Green, Moule and Schnepp, JJ.

Cases cited