Majority
Judgment unanimously reversed, on the law and facts, plea vacated, motion to suppress granted and defendant remanded to Wyoming County Court for further proceedings on the indictment. Memorandum: The suppression court erred by refusing to suppress evidence seized pursuant to a warrantless arrest and a search warrant. The information on the warrant application failed to meet the second prong of the Aguilar-Spinelli test (see Aguilar v Texas, 378 US 108 ; Spinelli v United States, 393 US 410 ), since the warrant application does not state the informant’s “basis of knowledge”, nor was the information so detailed as to make clear that it was based on personal observation (People v Elwell, 50 NY2d 231 , 242). Although we would find the warrant application sufficient under the “totality of the circumstances” test (Illinois v Gates, 462 US 213 ), that test has not yet been adopted by the Court of Appeals (see, e.g., People v Landy, 59 NY2d 369 , 375), which has continued to apply the two-pronged Aguilar test (see People v Comforto, 62 NY2d 725 ; see, also, People v Brown, 95 AD2d 569 , 572; People v Lopez, 95 AD2d 241 , 251 [applying the two-
Cases cited
- Aguilar v. Texas 378 US 108 p. 1110
- Spinelli v. United States 393 US 410 p. 1110
- People v. Elwell 50 NY2d 231 at 242 p. 1110
- Illinois v. Gates 462 US 213 p. 1110
- People v. Landy 59 NY2d 369 at 375 p. 1110
- People v. Comforto 62 NY2d 725 p. 1110
- People v. Brown 95 AD2d 569 at 572 p. 1110
- People v. Lopez 95 AD2d 241 at 251 p. 1110
- United States v. Leon 104 S Ct 3405 p. 1111