Hyperlawhypertext legal database Sturm v. Lyding 109 A.D.2d 1102

← Cases

Sturm v. Lyding

109 A.D.2d 1102 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1985-03-01 English

Contents

Majority

p. 1102
Matter of Leyland Sturm, Respondent, v Sue N. Lyding, Respondent, and Suzanne Sturm, Appellant.

— Order unanimously reversed, as a matter of discretion in the interest of justice, without costs, and motion granted. Memorandum: In view of the history of this proceeding (see, Sturm v Lyding, 101

p. 1103
AD2d 1026 ; Sturm v Lyding, 96 AD2d 731 ) and since Suzanne is about to reach her majority, we do not believe it is in her best interests to compel visitation by means of an arrest warrant. (Appeal from order of Niagara County Family Court, Halpin, J. — quash warrant.) Present — Hancock, Jr., J. P., Callahan, Doerr, Denman and O’Donnell, JJ.