← Cases

Delaney v. Automated Bread Corp.

110 A.D.2d 677 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1985-04-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 677
James J. Delaney, Respondent, v Automated Bread Corp., Appellant.
p. 678
The penalty of striking a pleading for failure to comply with an order of disclosure (CPLR 3126 [3]) is an extreme one which is warranted only where the failure has been willful or contumacious (Bassett v Bando Sangsa Co., 103 AD2d 728 ; Oppenheim & Macnow v Worth, 103 AD2d 687 ; Joseph v Roller Castle, 100 AD2d 839 ; Battaglia v Hofmeister, 100 AD2d 833 ; cf. Baumann v Dee, 100 AD2d 504 ). Under the facts and circumstances of this . case, we conclude that defendant should be granted one final opportunity to comply with the discovery order within the time we have prescribed (Joseph v Roller Castle, supra).

In the event defendant fails to so comply, its answer shall be stricken. Titone, J. P., Bracken, Rubin and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cases cited