Majority
To the extent that the billing and collection practices, etc., of Public Service Law article 2 conflict with the more general grant of authority to municipalities to establish their own methods of operation found in General Municipal Law article 14-A, the General Municipal Law provisions are impliedly revoked and the later, more specific, provisions of the Public Service Law control. Although it is preferred that, where possible, both
Here, the statutes in question are in such plain and unavoidable conflict that they cannot be reconciled. Either the municipality must be allowed to establish its own billing and collection practices under the General Municipal Law, or it must follow those procedures set out in the more recently enacted Public Service Law article 2. In such a case, the later and more specific law, which here attempts to establish uniform procedures, must prevail.
We have considered appellant’s other contentions and find them to be without merit. Moflen, P. J., Mangano, Thompson and O’Connor, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Newman 32 NY2d 379 at 389 p. 705
- Reynolds v. Tennessee 414 US 1163 p. 705
- In re the Arbitration between Nassau Insurance & Epps 63 AD2d 473 at 479 p. 705
- People v. Mann 31 NY2d 253 at 258 p. 705
- Board of Education v. Allen 6 NY2d 127 at 141-142 p. 705
- New York State Cable Television Ass'n v. Public Service Commission 87 AD2d 288 at 291 p. 705
- Harvey v. Finnick 88 AD2d 40 p. 705
- Kelley v. McGee 57 NY2d 522 p. 705