Majority
Judgment affirmed.
Defendant’s challenge to the sufficiency of the plea allocution is not preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, CPL 470.05 [2]; People v Hoke, 62 NY2d 1022 ; People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636 ). In any event, the allocution satisfied the basic requirements of People v Harris ( 61 NY2d 9 ) and thus vacatur is not warranted (see, People v Moore, 110 AD2d 720 ; People v De Santis, 108 AD2d 821 ; People v Schron, 109 AD2d 762 ).
The sentence of 7 to 21 years’ imprisonment imposed for manslaughter in the first degree, and which was the product of a negotiated plea, was not an abuse of discretion by the sentencing Judge (People v Kazepis, 101 AD2d 816 ). Nor do the facts of this case warrant a substitution of our discretion for that of the sentencing Judge (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 ; People v Hyde, 110 AD2d 716 ). Thompson, J. P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Hoke 62 NY2d 1022 p. 878
- People v. Pellegrino 60 NY2d 636 p. 878
- People v. Harris 61 NY2d 9 p. 878
- People v. De Santis 108 AD2d 821 p. 878
- People v. Schron 109 AD2d 762 p. 878
- People v. Suitte 90 AD2d 80 p. 878