Hyperlawhypertext legal database Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc. 112 A.D.2d 191

← Cases

Hirsch v. Peekskill Ranch, Inc.

112 A.D.2d 191 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1985-07-08 English

Contents

Majority

p. 191
Moe Hirsch et al., Appellants, v Peekskill Ranch, Inc., et al., Defendants, and Richard W. Fulfree, Respondent.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Coppola, J.), dated July 26, 1984, which directed that a hearing be conducted to determine the receiver’s claim for reimbursement for necessary expenditures.

Appeal dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

An order directing a judicial hearing to aid in the disposi

p. 192
tion of a motion does not affect a substantial right (see, CPLR 5701 [a] [2] [v]) and therefore is not appealable as of right (see, De Santis v De Santis, 107 AD2d 734 ; Warner v Warner, 88 AD2d 639 ; Bagdy v Progresso Foods Corp., 86 AD2d 589 ). Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Niehoff and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cases cited