Hyperlawhypertext legal database Knowle v. Kane 112 A.D.2d 53

← Cases

Knowle v. Kane

112 A.D.2d 53 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1985-06-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 53
In the Matter of Gary Knowle et al., Petitioners, v James B. Kane et al., Respondents, and Richard J. Arcara, Intervenor-Respondent.

Application unanimously denied and petition dismissed, without costs. Memorandum: Mandamus, like prohibition, is an extraordinary remedy and it is not appropriate in

p. 54
this case (see, Matter of Legal Aid Socy. v Scheinman, 53 NY2d 12 ,16; see also, Matter of Okereke v Kane, 98 AD2d 990 ). (Article 78.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Boomer, O’Donnell, Pine and Schnepp, JJ.

Cases cited