Majority
—Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Rigler, J.), ren
Judgment affirmed.
While returning home on the night of March 13, 1982, complainant fell asleep on a subway train and, upon being awakened, discovered that a sum of money was missing from his pocket. The evidence adduced at trial, including testimony from the arresting officer and from defendant’s accomplice, established that defendant acted as a "lookout” while his accomplice removed the money from complainant’s person.
Defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt (People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 , 621), and thus the court did not err in denying defendant’s motion to dismiss, made after both sides rested, on the ground that the People had not made out a prima facie case. Furthermore, the court did not abuse its discretion in admitting certain expert testimony (see, People v Cronin, 60 NY2d 430 , 433; Rodriguez v Board of Educ., 104 AD2d 978 , 979).
We have examined defendant’s remaining contentions and find them to be without merit. Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Brown and Fiber, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 at 621 p. 479
- People v. Cronin 60 NY2d 430 at 433 p. 479
- Rodriguez v. Board of Education 104 AD2d 978 at 979 p. 479