← Cases

Johnson v. Gumer

120 A.D.2d 935 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1986-05-23 English

Contents

Majority

p. 935
Warren D. Johnson et al., Respondents-Appellants, v Max Gumer, Appellant-Respondent.

— Order unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: Special Term properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations. We agree with plaintiffs that as to the cause of action for breach of contract, the six-year Statute of Limitations controls (see,

p. 936
Ganley v Troy City Natl. Bank, 98 NY 487 , 494-495; Baratta v Kozlowski, 94 AD2d 454 , 460-463). Defendant has failed to show, therefore, that the action was untimely commenced. (Appeals from order of Supreme Court, Orleans County, Fritsch, J. — summary judgment.) Present — Callahan, J. P., Doerr, Denman, Boomer and Pine, JJ.

Cases cited