Majority
p. 974John C. Kanaley et al., Respondents, v Paul Brennan et al., Constituting the Planning Board of the Town of Onondaga, Respondents, and Stephen W. Buechner et al., Appellants.
— Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Memorandum: We affirm for the reasons that the developers failed to submit a site development plan with sufficient dimensional information to permit the Planning Board to determine that
p. 975
the proposal meets lot size and density requirements (see, Town Law § 281 [b]) and that the Board failed to make a reasoned elaboration of the basis for its negative declaration (see, H.O.M.E.S. v New York State Urban Dev. Corp., 69 AD2d 222 , 232). (Appeal from judgment of Supreme Court, Onondaga County, Roy, J. — art 78.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Callahan, Doerr, Pine and Balio, JJ. [119 Mise 2d 1003.]
Cases cited
- H.O.M.E.S. v. New York State Urban Development Corp. 69 AD2d 222 at 232 p. 975