Majority
— In an action seeking an injunction pursuant to General Business Law § 133 and
Order affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The plaintiff failed to raise any triable issue of fact regarding the defendants’ intent in adopting its business name. Thus, the plaintiff’s first cause of action, which was brought under General Business Law § 133, was properly dismissed (see, General Business Law § 133; Association of Contr. Plumbers v Contracting Plumbers Assn., 302 NY 495 , 501; Matter of Playland Holding Corp. v Playland Center, 1 NY2d 300 , 303; Matter of Dunkin’ Donuts of Am. v Dunkin Donuts, 8 AD2d 228 ; Matter of State of New York v Bevis Indus., 63 Misc 2d 1088 , 1091). Bracken, J. P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Association of Contracting Plumbers of the City of New York, Inc. v. Contracting Plumbers Ass'n of Brooklyn & Queens, Inc. 302 NY 495 at 501 p. 246
- Playland Holding Corp. v. Playland Center, Inc. 1 NY2d 300 at 303 p. 246
- Dunkin' Donuts of America, Inc. v. Dunkin Donuts, Inc. 8 AD2d 228 p. 246
- State v. Bevis Industries, Inc. 63 Misc 2d 1088 at 1091 p. 246