Majority
p. 921Dennis Hurley et al., Respondents, v County of Al
p. 922bany, Defendant, and Otis Elevator Company, Appellant.
A review of the record reveals that Supreme Court did not abuse its discretion in denying defendant Otis Elevator Company’s motion for a protective order (see, Allen v Crowell-Collier Pub. Co., 21 NY2d 403 ). The order should therefore be affirmed.
Order affirmed, with costs. Kane, J. P., Main, Yesawich, Jr., Levine and Harvey, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- Allen v. Crowell-Collier Publishing Co. 21 NY2d 403 p. 922