← Cases

Raptis v. Grand Union Co.

13 A.D.2d 738 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1961-05-11 English

Contents

Majority

p. 738
Katherine Raptis, Respondent, v. Grand Union Company, Appellant.

— Order entered on or about January 9, 1961, denying defendant’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint for legal insufficiency under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, unanimously reversed, on the law, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant and the motion granted, with $10 costs, with leave, in the exercise of discretion, to plaintiff-respondent to serve a further amended complaint. The allegations of breach of covenant are

p. 739
patently conclusory and, therefore, insufficient. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, Stevens, Eager and Bastow, JJ.