Hyperlawhypertext legal database Jones v. Klachkin 13 A.D.2d 911

← Cases

Jones v. Klachkin

13 A.D.2d 911 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1961-06-06 English

Contents

Majority

p. 911
Ira Jones, Appellant, v. Max R. Klachkin et al., Respondents, et al., Defendants.

Order entered' on February 5, 1960, granting defendant-respondent, Joseph Blau’s motion, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and

p. 912
disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Order entered on February 5, 1960, granting defendant-respondent, Max R. Klaehkin’s motion, pursuant to rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the amended complaint, unanimously affirmed, with $20 costs and disbursements to the respondents. No opinion. Concur—Valente, J. P., McNally, Stevens and Eager, JJ.