Majority
Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Beldock, J.), rendered February 13, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The evidence adduced at trial was sufficient as a matter of law to support the defendant’s conviction of robbery in the second degree (Penal Law § 160.10; see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 ). Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the defendant’s guilt was proven beyond a reasonable doubt and that the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (CPL 470.15 [5]). Clearly,
Having failed to register his objections to the court’s charge at trial, the defendant has not preserved his claims for appellate review (see, People v Chin, 67 NY2d 22 ; CPL 470.05 [2]). In any event, the charge was fair and proper (see, People v Saunders, 64 NY2d 665 , on remand 112 AD2d 1051 ; People v Demming, 116 AD2d 886 , lv denied 67 NY2d 941 ). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Lawrence and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Cases cited
- People v. Contes 60 NY2d 620 p. 466
- People v. Chin 67 NY2d 22 p. 467
- People v. Saunders 64 NY2d 665 p. 467