← Cases

Rowe v. Levine

14 A.D.2d 779 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1961-10-02 English

Contents

Majority

p. 779
Joseph K. Rowe, Appellant, v. Alexander E. Levine, Respondent.

The allegations in support of the present counterclaim are vague and ambiguous. Defendant has failed to allege: (1) the terms of the agreement or understanding, if any, for the occupancy by plaintiff of defendant’s office and for the use by plaintiff of defendant’s office facilities; (2) the manner in which plaintiff breached such terms; and (3) the factual basis for the damage claimed. Every pleader is required to set forth a plain and concise statement of all the material facts which give rise to the cause of action asserted (cf. Civ. Prac, Act, § 241). Nolan P. J., Beldock, Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Christ, JJ., concur.