Majority
Contrary to the plaintiff’s present contentions, the Supreme Court, Putnam County, properly dismissed the complaint pursuant to the Statute of Frauds (see, General Obligations Law § 5-703 [2]), as the letters and other documents submitted by the plaintiff failed to set forth all of the essential and material terms for a valid agreement among the parties for the conveyance of interests in real property (see, Tetz v Dexter, 133 AD2d 79 ; Tamir v Greenberg, 119 AD2d 665 , lv denied 68 NY2d 607 ; Villano v G & C Homes, 46 AD2d 907 , appeal dismissed 36 NY2d 918 , lv dismissed 40 NY2d 959 ). Moreover, the plaintiff failed to establish any partial performance which was unequivocally referable to the alleged agreement (see, e.g., Jones-town Place Corp. v 153 W. 33rd St. Corp., 53 NY2d 847 ; Wilson v La Van, 22 NY2d 131 ; Korff v Pica Graphics, 121 AD2d 511 ; Christou v Christou, 109 AD2d 1058 , affd 65 NY2d 853 ), nor
Cases cited
- Tamir v. Greenberg 119 AD2d 665 p. 409
- People v. Scheck 36 NY2d 918 p. 409
- Villano v. G & C Homes, Inc. 40 NY2d 959 p. 409
- Jonestown Place Corp. v. 153 West 33rd Street Corp. 53 NY2d 847 p. 409
- Wilson v. La Van 22 NY2d 131 p. 409
- Christou v. Christou 109 AD2d 1058 p. 409
- Towpash v. Towpash 119 AD2d 567 p. 410