Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta Porcelli v. Zapparo 140 A.D.2d 423

← Cases

Porcelli v. Zapparo

140 A.D.2d 423 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1988-05-09 English

Contents

Majority

p. 423
Michael Porcelli, Appellant, v Joseph Zapparo, Respondent.

We find that the Supreme Court erred in granting the

p. 424
defendant summary judgment dismissing the complaint. The hospital record X-ray report bearing the defendant’s stamped signature constituted admissible documentary evidence (CPLR 4518 [b]) sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to whether the defendant was involved in the alleged erroneous interpretation of the X ray. Mollen, P. J., Thompson, Rubin and Spatt, JJ., concur.