Hyperlawhypertext legal databasebeta In re Ehrlich 146 A.D.2d 428

← Cases

In re Ehrlich

146 A.D.2d 428 Court First Department, Decision date 1989-05-18 English

Contents

Majority

p. 428
In the Matter of Bernard Ehrlich, an Attorney, Respondent. Departmental Disciplinary Committee for the First Judicial Department, Petitioner.
First Department,
May 18, 1989
APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL
Hal R. Lieberman, Acting Chief Counsel, for petitioner.
No appearance on behalf of respondent.

OPINION OF THE COURT

Respondent was admitted to practice law in this State on May 2, 1952, in the Second Judicial Department. At all relevant times herein, respondent has maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

On January 12, 1989, defendant pleaded guilty to the felony of bribe receiving in the second degree in the Supreme Court, New York County. A certificate evidencing this conviction has been presented to the court. (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [b].)

Although not yet sentenced, respondent ceased to be an

p. 429
attorney and counselor-at-law upon his conviction of a felony. (Judiciary Law § 90 [4] [a]; Matter of Geller, 97 AD2d 306 .)

Accordingly, the petition should be granted and respondent’s name should be stricken from the roll of attorneys forthwith.

Sullivan, J. P., Carro, Asch, Kassal and Wallach, JJ., concur.

Respondent’s name is stricken from the roll of attorneys and counselors-at-law in the State of New York forthwith.

Cases cited

Statutes and regulations cited