Majority
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: On appeal from his conviction for murder in the second degree defendant claims that the trial court erred in admitting into evidence defendant’s clothing and testimony, and in refusing to give a missing witness charge; that the People failed to present evidence corroborating defendant’s confession (CPL 60.50); and that the court abused its discretion in imposing the maximum term of imprisonment based upon a racial consideration. We agree that the court should not have permitted defendant’s sister to
The remaining issues were either not preserved for our review (CPL 470.05 [2]) or lack merit. There was abundant evidence connecting defendant’s clothing to the homicide, warranting receipt of that evidence (see, People v Demming, 116 AD2d 886 , lv denied 67 NY2d 941 ). The People demonstrated that the claimed missing witnesses were not within their control and, in any event, their testimony would have been cumulative (see, People v Gonzalez, 68 NY2d 424 ). Lastly, the court’s general reference to defendant’s appearance had no bearing upon the sentence imposed. (Appeal from judgment of Erie County Court, Forma, J. — murder, second degree, and other charges.) Present — Doerr, J. P., Denman, Pine, Balio and Lawton, JJ.
Cases cited
- People v. Mirenda 23 NY2d 439 at 453 p. 958
- People v. Capella 111 AD2d 179 p. 958
- People v. Crimmins 36 NY2d 230 at 242 p. 958
- People v. Gonzalez 68 NY2d 424 p. 958