Ficarra v. Sestak

15 A.D.2d 495 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1961-12-04 English

Contents

Majority

p. 495

Augustine Ficarra, Respondent, v. William Sestak, Appellant.

p. 496

Without reaching the question whether the expunged testimony and memorandum were or were not admissible in evidence, it is our opinion that the unusual circumstances of this ease require a new trial in the interests of justice. Nolan, P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld and Brennan, JJ., concur; Beldock, J., not voting.