Hyperlawhypertext legal database Colosimo v. Rosenstock 15 A.D.2d 663

← Cases

Colosimo v. Rosenstock

15 A.D.2d 663 Court N.Y. App. Div. Decision date 1962-01-15 English

Contents

Majority

p. 663
Michael J. Colosimo, Respondent, v. Mildred Rosenstock et al., Appellants.

In our opinion, the record presents triable issues of fact which may not be resolved upon a motion for summary judgment. (Seman v. Harran, 15 A D 2d 506 ; Mapp v. Kipperman, 12 A D 2d 958 ; Block v. Acerra, 12 A D 2d 525 ; Mandell v. Field, 11 A D 2d 1074 .) Beldock, P. J., Ughetta, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cases cited